The European Studies Review Blog aims to provide a space for students and recent graduates to reflect and discuss a wide range of topics related to European affairs.
Requirements
Length
In order to increase accessibility for our readers, we aim that our blog articles should be no longer than 1,000 words.
Titles
Titles should be no longer than 12 words.
References
Hyperlinks should be used at the relevant point of argument within blog articles. Hyperlinks should preferably link to open access sources rather than sources requiring a paid subscription.
Language and Writing Style
Articles should be written in English. The use of British English is preferred to ensure consistency across articles. The use of quotes in any other language is permitted but requires a direct translation to English for accessible reading.
In order to promote understanding of the topics, we encourage writers to keep their language clear and simple, remembering the broad readership of European Studies Review. We also recommend short paragraphs to achieve this.
Graphs and Charts
We encourage the use of graphs and charts to elaborate on your discussion. Please label your graph or charts and provide the source of the data.
Originality and Academic Integrity
Use of Generative AI and large language models (LLMs)
European Studies Review recognises the increased prevalence of the use of artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. While these tools present new opportunities for the research process, their misuse also presents great risks to creativity, critical thinking, and credibility. At ESR, we value our position as a journal that allows students and recent graduates to improve their writing and publish their ideas. The improper use of LLMs by authors limits their ability to grow and learn in these areas, and we take it very seriously. We have therefore adopted these guidelines regarding the use of Gen AI and LLMs in our journal and blog articles.
LLMs CAN be used for:
- Basic checks for spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
- Formatting references, though you as the author are responsible for checking their accuracy against the Chicago Manual of Style.
- Early brainstorming or critiquing your own ideas.
LLMs can NOT be used for:
- Generating text for articles. We consider this to be plagiarism.
- Significant revision of text: if you would not ask another person to do it for you in your academic writing, you should not ask AI to do it either.
- Generating references.
- Use as a deeper search engine to conduct substantial or large-scale research (including literature reviews, source discovery, or synthesis of academic material).
Disclosure and accuracy:
- Any use of LLMs beyond basic spelling/grammar checks requires a disclosure by the author of the tool used and a description of how it was used.
- If LLMs are used in any capacity in the brainstorming or researching of your article, you as the author are responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information.
Prior Submission and Coursework
We do not accept articles which have been published elsewhere. We also do not accept articles that have been submitted as an assignment to a university that does not allow the external use or publication of university coursework. Authors are responsible for checking their university’s policy on the submission of coursework to external publications.
How to Submit
Email your blog article to europeanstudiesreview@gmail.com, with “Blog Article Submission” and the title in the subject line. Articles must be submitted in Microsoft Word Document format.
The Editing Process
Once your article has been submitted, your article will be reviewed by a member of the editorial team. The article will be assessed for grammar, clarity and strength of argument, taking into account the evidence and sources used.
Articles may not be published should concerns arise regarding controversial or defamatory statement or articles which may impact the reputation of European Studies Review.
We strive to ensure our writers get satisfaction from the editing process. Therefore, all writers are provided with feedback on their articles and areas in which they can improve.
The final version of the article will not be published without the consent of the writer.
We aim to ensure this feedback is provided in a timely manner, however delays may occur. If this occurs, do not worry, we will get back to you as soon as possible.
If you are not happy with the feedback provided, you can request to have your article independently reviewed by the Senior Editor. These requests should be sent to europeanstudiesreview@gmail.com outlining your problem.
If you have any other questions, please email us at europeanstudiesreview@gmail.com.
European Studies Review 